Posts Tagged ‘Channels’

Brandtology Featured in Business Time Article “Web Attracting new ad spend”

Friday, October 8th, 2010

As part of an Business Time article (“Web attracting new ad spend, The Business Times, 7 Oct 2010) discussing how companies are spending more ad dollars online, Brandtology’s CEO, Eddie Chau was cited, along with Ms Margaret Chang, Yahoo’s general manager for search marketing, South East Asia.

Eddie commented that business are better off concentrating on where users are spending their time. Referring to the popularity of local forums and bulletin boards, he said that these channels allow for lengthier and more in-depth conversations between users, in particular those who want to interact within their communities.

In contrast, Facebook and Twitter are built for messages that are more “on the go” and do not allow for the depth found within forums. Furthermore, messages posted on Facebook are typically limited to an individual’s friends, while forums are indexed well by search engines and reach a much larger audience.

The article also cited a newly released report highlighting the top 10 channels for online conversations for the months of July and August in Singapore.

Comprehensive Social Media Metrics Solution Enable Tracking of Campaign & Branding Effectiveness

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

Global Online Intelligence Leader, Brandtology releases Digital Conversation Management System v2.5 with enhanced measurement and tracking capabilities

24 JUNE 2010 – Brandtology, a global online intelligence service provider has rolled out the latest version of its Digital Conversation Management System (DCMS). The DCMS v2.5 comes with a comprehensive set of metrics to aid global brands and agencies in measuring key aspects of social media involvement, such as engagement, reach, influence and sentiments.

The various social media metrics newly introduced in the system will enable brand managers and consumer insight teams to grasp an overview of all subjects being monitored (be it their brand, competing brands or their various product lines) in the social media space and discover market leaders and laggards.

For instance, the ‘Engagement’ metric quantifies the content creation and response level of a particular subject. The number of conversations unilaterally initiated, as well as the number of relevant comments and responses are taken into account in determining their relative engagement as compared to other subjects in the entire category. Thus, a brand that pushes out boring articles methodically without garnering responses will fare very poorly on the engagement front.

Similarly, the ‘Influence’ metric measures whether conversations being made are by key opinion leaders online, thus translating to response generation and consequently readership. On the other hand, when measuring ‘Reach’, we look at how deep and wide the conversations relating to a particular subject ‘travel’ among influential channels online. A high reach score indicate the ability of a subject to spread related conversations far and wide. Last but not least, the ‘Sentiment’ index looks at the average net sentiment score of all conversations within the subject. More details on each metric can be found in Appendix A.

Commenting on the new DCMS v2.5, Eddie Chau, CEO of Brandtology said: “As brands divert their focus to social media marketing and consequently their budgets, there is a need to seek a more quantifiable manner of measuring the ROI of their activities on the social media platform. In response to feedback from our clients and partners, we have developed this new metric system for the purpose of such analysis.”

Besides the social media metrics section, the new system features five other new components such as an account profiling statistical overview, enhanced Social Media Equity charts to enable comparisons over time, conversation thread trend charts, a bookmarking feature to allow efficient workflow management and last but not least, a new chart sampling function unique to Brandtology.

By combining proprietary crawler technology to extract high volumes of relevant conversations from influential channels with trained social media analysts who recheck a portion of these conversations Brandtology is able to provide highly relevant and accurate insights. The new chart sampling feature leverages on this unique model to provide clients the option to toggle between the entire raw data set and rechecked conversations to show share of voice charts with near 100% accuracy.

“Due to the high volumes of conversations in countries with a large netizen base, such as USA and China, this chart sampling feature will allow clients the flexibility to manage and draw insights from large volumes of data but still be able to produce highly accurate charts for key categories for management reporting,” Eden Lau, Managing Director of North Asia, Brandtology, opined.

Apart from new feature, menus in the new DCMS v2.5 have also been reorganised into more intuitive sections to facilitate navigation and extraction of vital data required – namely Trends, Insights, Channels, Influencers and Social Media Equity. In addition, an FAQ section and tooltips have been added to explain the various data sections.

“With the new DCMS v2.5, we are confident of going beyond simple data collation to providing analytical insights that can integrate with strategic business processes and directly contribute to our clients’ bottom line,” added Kelly Choo, Business Development Director of Brandtology.

For more information and a demo of the new DCMS v2.5, please contact:

About Brandtology

With more than 140 staff in 12 global locations, Brandtology’s business and brand online intelligence services enable global brands to manage and glean invaluable insights from consumers’ conversations. Using proprietary technology, processes and trained professionals, Brandtology is able to provide a high degree of accuracy and relevancy in multilingual analysis, unlike any other automated monitoring tools. Astute global organisations utilise Brandtology’s intelligence in multiple functional areas such as sales, marketing, PR, media planning, customer service and product development. For more information, please visit www.brandtology.com

Appendix A – Detailed explanation of Social Media Metrics

More details on http://www.brandtology.com/blog/dcms-v2-5/

a)    Engagement ( 0% – 100%)

The engagement metric quantifies the content creation and response level of a particular subject. The number of conversations unilaterally initiated, as well as the number of relevant comments and responses are taken into account in determining their relative engagement as compared to other subjects in the entire category. Thus, a brand that pushes out boring articles methodically without garnering responses will fare very poorly on the engagement front. Likewise for a brand that has low activity levels and relies on spill-over buzz from other articles which primary focus is not on them.

b)    Influence ( 0 – 100)

Conversations by key opinion leaders online or what we term as influencers are gauged on their influence level. Their influence score is derived based on various parameters such as the total number of posts made and replies to their posts. The median of all influencers discussing a particular subject is then presented as the influence of that subject.

The higher the influence score, the more powerful the conversations relating to a particular subject is in terms of generating comments and consequently readership levels.

c)    Reach ( 0% – 100%)

The voice of a brand may be concentrated within a few key sites or virally discussed across various influential channels online. When measuring reach, we look at how deep and wide the conversations relating to a particular subject ‘travel’ among influential channels online. A high reach score indicate the ability of a subject to spread related conversations far and wide.

d)    Sentiment Index for the Subject ( -100% – 100%)

Sentiment index looks at the average net sentiment score of all conversations within the subject. This index denotes whether the average sentiment of all buzz relating to a subject is more positive or more negative.

Brandtology releases Digital Conversation Management System v2.5

Monday, June 21st, 2010

How do I measure my Social Media influence/reach/engagement?

Ever so often, we hear this query raised by our clients and partners. As brands divert their focus to online marketing and consequently their budgets, there is a need to seek a more quantifiable manner of measuring the ROI of their activities on the social media platform. There are various metrics on our existing platform to aid in such analysis, but in response to feedback, we have decided to carve out an entire new section in our Digital Conversation Management System version 2.5.

The new system features six main new components:

1) Social Media Metrics:

  • Engagement
  • Reach
  • Influence
  • Sentiment
  • 2) Chart sampling feature – ability to toggle between rechecked conversations and the entire data set to generate quantitative and qualitative charts

    3) Account Statistical Profiling:

  • Buzz & Sentiments
  • Conversations & Voices
  • Channels
  • 4) Enhanced Social Media Equity Charts – allowing tracking of Social Media Equity (a 4d chart measuring buzz, sentiment, influence) over time and across subjects

    5) Conversation Trends – provision of buzz trends within a single conversation thread

    6) Bookmarking – enabling users to tag individual posts for easy follow-up and data export

    Menus have also been reorganised into intuitive sections to facilitate navigation and extraction of vital data required – namely Trends, Insights, Channels, Influencers and Social Media Equity. In addition, an FAQ section and tooltips have been added to explain the various data sections.

    Enhanced Metrics for ROI measurement and strategic business planning

    1.Social Media Metrics

    The various social media metrics newly introduced in our system enables brand managers to grasp an overview of all subjects being monitored (be it their brand, competing brands or their various product lines) in the social media space and discover market leaders and laggards.

    a) Engagement (0%-100%)

    The engagement metric quantifies the content creation and response level of a particular subject. The number of conversations unilaterally initiated, as well as the number of relevant comments and responses are taken into account in determining their relative engagement as compared to other subjects in the entire category. Thus, a brand that pushes out boring articles methodically without garnering responses will fare very poorly on the engagement front. Likewise for a brand that has low activity levels and relies on spill-over buzz from other articles which primary focus is not on them.

    b) Influence (0-100)

    Conversations by key opinion leaders online or what we term as influencers are gauged on their influence level. Their influence score is derived based on various parameters such as the total number of posts made and replies to their posts. The median of all influencers discussing a particular subject is then presented as the influence of that subject.

    The higher the influence score, the more powerful the conversations relating to a particular subject is in terms of generating comments and consequently readership levels.

    c) Reach (0%-100%)

    The voice of a brand may be concentrated within a few key sites or virally discussed across various influential channels online. When measuring reach, we look at how deep and wide the conversations relating to a particular subject ‘travel’ among influential channels online. A high reach score indicate the ability of a subject to spread related conversations far and wide.

    d) Sentiment Index for the Subject (-100%-100%)

    Sentiment index looks at the average net sentiment score of all conversations within the subject. This index denotes whether the average sentiment of all buzz relating to a subject is more positive or more negative.

    New Charting Features for Data Accuracy

    2) Chart sampling feature – ability to toggle between rechecked conversations and the entire data set to generate quantitative and qualitative charts

    By having trained social media analysts re-check the automated analysis performed by our technology, Brandtology ensures an exceptionally high accuracy and relevancy level of the data set provided to our clients. However, when doing an industry wide scan of conversations on competing products and other potential interest areas, clients typically only need an overview of the share of voice of their brands. Hence, the sampling feature allows the clients to see the share of voice clearly.

    Nevertheless, to differentiate between the automatically rated sentiments & buzz charts and buzz of rechecked conversations, especially for generating visual charts, we have added a feature to allow users to toggle between these 2 data sets.

    Statistical Profiling of Conversations for Deeper Insights

    3) Account Statistical Profiling

    The new account profile section gives a quick statistical overview snapshot of all subjects being monitored in terms of a) Buzz & Sentiments, b) Conversations and Voices and c) Channels.

    a) Buzz & Sentiments

    This table gives a summary of the total buzz for each subject, as well as the breakdown in sentiment for each subject. The numerical statistics are also colour coded, thus allowing you to quickly identify weaknesses or strengths of all subjects monitored in terms of buzz and sentiments.

    b) Conversations and Voices

    This Conversation and Voices table provides a summary of the new conversations, comments, as well as active voices engaging in a given subject.

    This is particularly useful for identifying popular conversations which are garnering a lot of comments/replies, as well as identifying the number of netizens contributing to the buzz. Interestingly, this would also enable clients to quickly detect ‘hot topics with numerous comments/replies but actually fuelled by a very small group of netizens. Such abnormalities would be easily picked up from this table.

    c) Channels

    The Channels table shows the total number of channels where conversations are taking place about each subject and further categorises them by channel type. This would help clients to identify dominant channel types for each subject and better plan their engagement/advertising efforts.

    Tracking of Social Media Equity over time for brand and campaign measurement

    4) Enhanced Social Media Equity Charts –allowing tracking of Social Media Equity (a 4d chart measuring buzz, sentiment, influence) over time and across subjects

    The Social Media Equity chart is a 4-dimensional chart that plots the position of a specific product or service in relation to other competing brands or other products/services within the same brand.

    This bubble chart is based on 4 factors – Average Sentiment, Average Influence, Buzz Share and Time. The x- and y-axes represent the average sentiment and influence respectively, with the size of the bubble indicating relative buzz share. The time factor can be adjusted to show the movement of individual bubbles along the chart over a specified time period.

    The Social Media Equity chart helps to gauge relative position not just amongst competitors but also amongst a brand’s stable of products and services. This is especially useful for product development departments to track the performance of various products.

    In this latest release of our DCMS, the Social Media Equity charts allow brands to track the performance of various subjects over time. In particular, this would be useful to track performance before a campaign, during a campaign and after a campaign to see if a campaign has resulted in a positive and sustained effect on a brand’s social media equity.

    Deeper Conversation Thread Analysis

    5) Conversation Trends – provision of buzz trends within a single conversation thread

    The ability to track the buzz trends of a particular conversation thread is also a new feature in the system. This allows brands to closely monitor hotly debated threads to see how the buzz unfolds. For positive seeded word-of-mouth, a long-tail effect is ideal but for negative brand conversations, it best to observe a decline in buzz after a few days.

    Bookmarking of Posts for Workflow Management and Efficient Follow-up

    6) Bookmarking – enabling users to tag individual posts for easy follow-up and data export

    For clients and partners who are more hands-on, a new bookmarking feature will allow them to bookmark selected posts for collation into a list for further analysis or export. This will facilitate research on specific conversation topics, or aid them in shortlisting posts which require further follow-up actions.

    Try out the new DCMS v.2.5

    If you are keen to see a demo session of our new DCMS, please do not hesitate to contact us via contact@brandtology.com

    Twitter – the Pop Culture Streaming Jukebox

    Thursday, June 17th, 2010

    Before Twitter, we never knew how 140 characters can give each individual a distinct voice. Over the years, Twitter has become a big collection of puzzle pieces to world history and everyday life.

    Yes, everyday life is complicated and problematic, and the news traumatic.  But amid all the negativity, people still find something to laugh at, to make life bearable and worth living. And of course there’s Twitter, the 140-character diary where everyone makes fun of life’s tragedies.

    Take for example climate change and global warming. Everyone has his own opinion on the subject:

    BREAKING-Note just found at Guatemala City sinkhole:

    “You f*** up my ocean, I’m taking back a building. Your move, b*****s.
    -Planet Earth”
    - @behindyourback

    We could make the world much greener this #earthday if we simply banned red and blue
    - @SustainableTips

    Yes, we live in a world threatened by massive climate changes, and it is reflected on Twitter. Also recorded by the electronic historian is the consumerist culture that dominates the 21st century, driven primarily by electronic products and technological advancements. As seen in these Tweets, we live in a world where Apple is no longer a fruit and Google has all the answers.

    best question at#d8: “Steve, we love our iPhones, but our concern is that we can’t make a phone call on it. Is someone working on that?”
    - @mathewi

    My internet is so slow, it’s just faster to drive to the Google headquarters and ask them shit in person.
    - @roughdiction

    I was going to go to the gym and run 7 miles this morning to continue trying to look good but then I remembered I own Photoshop
    - @ruthakers

    Since 3D is so popular, all my tweets will be in 3D from now on. But you have to supply your own glasses.
    - @kingsthings

    Somehow all our frustrations about the Internet or the new smartphone are also summed up by our Tweets. But it doesn’t stop at that. Everyday human life has its unique on goings even without a time-killing gadget. Who knew that people still care about typography?

    Waitress: ‘Do u have any questions about the menu?’

    Me: ‘What kind of font is this?’
    - @grainnwilson

    When I drink too much coffee, all my thoughts are in italics.
    - @JerryThomas

    But more than typography, the biggest human concern of modern humans is money. After all, how are we going to pay for the Wi-Fi, the cable TV, the unlimited SMS, the electric bill?

    I’ve reached that elusive point of being so broke I can’t even afford to care about it.
    - @Miss_Cook

    With great power comes a great electric bill
    - @ruthakers

    While there seems to be no end for Spiderman puns, lives end on a daily basis. Immortality is not yet invented and everyone is bound to die. Historical deaths, in particular are Twitter mainstays:

    If you’re famous and your name suddenly becomes a Twitter trending topic, you are probably dead
    - @dcurtis

    And so Twitter has become a chronicle of life and death. Because of Twitter we will forever remember this period in recorded history, and we can always look back, just like in a good old photo album. But in the end, no one can deny that if there is anything that Twitter really gave us, it is the platform where we can speak our minds, be ourselves and be in control without being afraid of what others may say.

    I must be honest. I just love tweeting to all of you, and you can’t really talk back. It makes me feel like the government.
    - @tammyphiney

    Slideshow 5 – Wide Coverage

    Friday, March 19th, 2010

    All about the Digital Brand Index 2.0

    Tuesday, January 26th, 2010
    View more presentations from Brandtology.

    Fundamentals of an effective social media strategy

    Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

     Often, companies jump onto the social media bandwagon excitedly and look around eagerly to see what they can do to be ‘in the game’.

    The result? Twitter accounts and Facebook pages with unexciting contents that gradually fail to interest its followers after they follow/become a fan. Their so-called social media strategy has become yet another method to pump out advertising messages, sales and promotional information and an impersonal one way communication conduit.

    This is definitely not wrong, but it is not a true social media strategy. Such an approach shows how a company has failed to understand the essence of social media and leverage on its power.

    Social Media is about communication within a social network, and the most powerful aspect of it is the ability to spread viral messages and to enhance the trustworthiness of messages via word-of-mouth. It turns monologues into interactive dialogues and advertisements into conversations.

    As with any successful initiative, planning is essential before an effective action plan can be crafted. Social Media is still a relatively new domain and consumer social media consumption habits are extremely fluid and fickle, hence it is of utmost importance to first research and listen to what’s being said online. If a strategy is based on wild guesses, or even calculated guesses, there is still a high chance (competitively disadvantageous) that there are blind spots that have been missed out. Look at the number of marketers with inactive twitter and facebook pages, as well as those who invested heavily in online advertising purely based on click rates.

    To craft a successful Social Media Strategy, companies should at least incorporate the following elements:

    1)      Research and understand the social media interests of your target market.
    This can be done through engaging social media monitoring/analytical services (like us) that provide analytical insights derived from genuine conversations online. Guesstimates are just not good enough. Companies may also complement this research with surveys, focus groups or their CRM analysis.

    2)      Find out where the conversations are taking place.
    Gear your strategy to either be part of the community they are involved in, or provide a platform for your target market. Be seen in the right place at the right time. Establish a presence to cultivate a top of mind awareness when purchase decisions are being made.

    3)      Create content, organize activities and generate conversations that align with your target market’s interests
    Based on observations of key conversation topics, create content and start conversations that genuinely value add to your prospects. Be a friend to them and provide them support and advice. Allow them to be the first to hear about breaking news and see how it quickly spreads in a viral manner. The quickest way to lose their trust and cause them to screen out your messages is to blindly push ‘buy-me-now’ messages. Engage and interest them, not alienate them.

    4)      Measure the effectiveness of your campaigns and refine them
    Social Media campaigns are visible and much more measurable than PR/mass media strategies that rely on recall ability/no. of news clippings as ROI metrics. Measure and prove the ROI of your strategies to the stakeholders who control the purse strings. Make feedback a continuous, reinforcing loop that constantly enhances your strategies.

    Well, I could easily go on and on about each point above and many other pointers, but I wanted to keep it succinct and digestible. To reiterate, planning is key in creating an effective social media strategy and listening is the cornerstone, the essential step that needs to be taken. As the saying goes, ‘if you fail to plan, then you plan to fail’.

    An Introduction to Brandtology’s DCMS Capabilities

    Saturday, March 21st, 2009

    Ever used the Internet to do your research for making your next purchase?   I would say most of us do.  It could either be looking for a new phone or checking out what the latest gadgets have to offer.  This is just two of the typical scenarios that as consumers is where we would normally want more information.  The question then, is how do we look for for it?  There is typically, Google Search of course!  Yes, most of us would just rely on Google’s returned results and start from there.  For the more hardcore folks, there are known forums that contain enthusiastic forumers that will do reviews, share complaints, questions and answers and so on.  These forums offer a lot more insight into various good as well as the bad from real users.

    From a company’s perspective, wouldn’t you want to know where all this information is residing?  You would want to protect your brand or get some immediate feedback on your product.  Wouldn’t you want to know if your investment in all that marketing and advertising paid off?  To do so, you would probably need to go through the same process of finding the information manually, using search engines or browsing through known forums.  This will take a lot of time and effort, and I mean a lot!  To consolidate all the information manually will become very tedious and cumbersome; not to mention how often you do it to ensure that everything is up to date?  It will be an uphill task without help.

    Now, allow me to demonstrate how Brandtology’s Digital Conversation Management System (DCMS) can help.  Let’s look at a scenario where as a corporate personnel of company ABC and I’m interested to gauge the online buzz/chatter for the Google phone in the Singapore.  For illustration purposes, in this example I’ve identified over 80 channels in Singapore that relates to the mobile phone industry, where their sites include: ChannelNewsAsia, GameAxis, Hardwarezone Forum, SGClub, SgForums, SingaporeBikes, Stomp, Electric Newpaper, VR-Zone and YoungNTUC.

    Focusing on the month of February 2009, the chart from DCMS below illustrates an overview of the various subjects that I am looking at.  Apple iPhone came up top with the highest buzz at 1796 posts and Nokia in second at about 568 posts with Google Phone at 514 posts.  The colors in the chart depict the sentiment ratings, for example with Google Phone, it had 218 very positive, 30 positive, 213 neutral, 11 negative and 42 very negative posts.  (Light Green = Very Positive, Dark Green = Positive, Blue = Neutral, Orange = Negative and Red = Very Negative).

    Next, we would want to know generally what is the online chatter about.  With our focus on Google Phone, from the Buzz Cluster in DCMS we observe the following.

    The green colors reflect a positive sentiment towards those phrases mentioned.  Light green represents very positive and the darker green represents positive.  The size of the font represents the frequency; the bigger the font the more frequent its being mentioned. Some of the key phrases give you clues into the posts.  For example “SingTel HTC Dream”, “Better than iPhone”, etc.

    Next, let’s look at the Buzz in February for the Google Phone.  A reference point to note here is that Channel News Asia featured an article that SingTel was bringing the Google Phone to Singapore on the 20th Feb.  It is obvious that the chatter or buzz on the online media space has increased on the 20th and hit a high of 47 for the 21st Feb.  This shows a correlation between the announcement and sparking off interest amongst the online forumers.  The benefit of this Buzz chart is that you can use it to gauge if an event or announcement is successful at generating buzz amongst online media users.

    The ability to determine the buzz only gives you an overall picture in its totality.  That may be enough for some, but what if you want to drill down into its details?  The next chart below illustrates how DCMS can breakdown where the buzz come from.  From here you can see that the channel with the most buzz is from Hardwarezone’s forum “Smart PDA, PDA phones and GPS SIG” followed by “Eat Drink Man Women”.  The intelligence you get here can be used for targeted advertising; choosing the channels that has the most relevant buzz.

    So far, I’ve mentioned about buzz, how about the number of bloggers/forumers? You may have a lot of buzz, but it could just be from one or two bloggers.  At times, you may want to know the number of unique bloggers that have mentioned your product or brand.  This is where you can gauge the “viral growth” or spread in online media.  The diagram below is DCMS’s Voice Growth chart.  It shows the number of unique new voices for each day and the cumulative number of voices over the February time period.  Like the Buzz chart, you can see that there was a significant number of new voices that grew from the 20th to the 22th after the announcement from SingTel on the 20th.  If the announcement was actually a promotional event, this is a very good indicator to determine its success in spreading the word.

    In summary, I’ve shown you briefly several features of DCMS’s capabilities and I hope it gives you an insight on how it can help you.  For my next blog entry I’ll demonstrate further its analytical capabilities and how it provides transparency in the online media information we gather.

    Stay tuned for more updates.

    Cheers!

    Dr. Alvin Chan

    Co-Founder and Vice President for R&D

     
    Tags
     
    Find out how Social Media Intelligence can help your Business and Brand
    Contact us