Posts Tagged ‘social media intelligence’

Brandtology DCMS Workshop For Singapore Polytechnic

Monday, June 28th, 2010

The Diploma in Business Information Technology (DBIT) partnered Brandtology to organise the first Digital Conversation Management System (DCMS) workshop for the Principles of New Media Marketing (PNMM) module students on 5th and 12th May 2010. The aim of the workshop was to educate students on the use of DCMS to produce a Business Report on Digital Conversations regarding the bidding for the FIFA World Cup broadcast rights in Singapore.

Brandtology provides companies and brand online intelligence services round the clock from the Social Media Command Centres. Brandtology’s DCMS is powered by an intelligent opinion mining and ticket-processing system which aids companies in listening to online digital conversations generated from blogs, forums, micro-blogs, news sites and other social medium.

The workshop was led by Brandtology’s Social Media Research Analyst, Joel Gn, who briefed the students on the functions and features of DCMS, followed by hands-on sessions. Joel mentioned to the DBIT students that the workshop was the first run by Brandtology for an educational institution.

Using the DCMS, students were able to rise to the challenge of analysing buzz and sentiments towards the bidding for the FIFA World Cup broadcast rights.

Overall, the workshop was indeed an eye-opener for students to see and understand what the online sentiments towards a brand or company were. They also learnt advanced data mining and analytics using a solid dataset and a versatile system like the DCMS. They were convinced that being conversant with advanced analytic systems would give them an edge in sales, marketing and advertising in the New Media landscape.

Comprehensive Social Media Metrics Solution Enable Tracking of Campaign & Branding Effectiveness

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

Global Online Intelligence Leader, Brandtology releases Digital Conversation Management System v2.5 with enhanced measurement and tracking capabilities

24 JUNE 2010 – Brandtology, a global online intelligence service provider has rolled out the latest version of its Digital Conversation Management System (DCMS). The DCMS v2.5 comes with a comprehensive set of metrics to aid global brands and agencies in measuring key aspects of social media involvement, such as engagement, reach, influence and sentiments.

The various social media metrics newly introduced in the system will enable brand managers and consumer insight teams to grasp an overview of all subjects being monitored (be it their brand, competing brands or their various product lines) in the social media space and discover market leaders and laggards.

For instance, the ‘Engagement’ metric quantifies the content creation and response level of a particular subject. The number of conversations unilaterally initiated, as well as the number of relevant comments and responses are taken into account in determining their relative engagement as compared to other subjects in the entire category. Thus, a brand that pushes out boring articles methodically without garnering responses will fare very poorly on the engagement front.

Similarly, the ‘Influence’ metric measures whether conversations being made are by key opinion leaders online, thus translating to response generation and consequently readership. On the other hand, when measuring ‘Reach’, we look at how deep and wide the conversations relating to a particular subject ‘travel’ among influential channels online. A high reach score indicate the ability of a subject to spread related conversations far and wide. Last but not least, the ‘Sentiment’ index looks at the average net sentiment score of all conversations within the subject. More details on each metric can be found in Appendix A.

Commenting on the new DCMS v2.5, Eddie Chau, CEO of Brandtology said: “As brands divert their focus to social media marketing and consequently their budgets, there is a need to seek a more quantifiable manner of measuring the ROI of their activities on the social media platform. In response to feedback from our clients and partners, we have developed this new metric system for the purpose of such analysis.”

Besides the social media metrics section, the new system features five other new components such as an account profiling statistical overview, enhanced Social Media Equity charts to enable comparisons over time, conversation thread trend charts, a bookmarking feature to allow efficient workflow management and last but not least, a new chart sampling function unique to Brandtology.

By combining proprietary crawler technology to extract high volumes of relevant conversations from influential channels with trained social media analysts who recheck a portion of these conversations Brandtology is able to provide highly relevant and accurate insights. The new chart sampling feature leverages on this unique model to provide clients the option to toggle between the entire raw data set and rechecked conversations to show share of voice charts with near 100% accuracy.

“Due to the high volumes of conversations in countries with a large netizen base, such as USA and China, this chart sampling feature will allow clients the flexibility to manage and draw insights from large volumes of data but still be able to produce highly accurate charts for key categories for management reporting,” Eden Lau, Managing Director of North Asia, Brandtology, opined.

Apart from new feature, menus in the new DCMS v2.5 have also been reorganised into more intuitive sections to facilitate navigation and extraction of vital data required – namely Trends, Insights, Channels, Influencers and Social Media Equity. In addition, an FAQ section and tooltips have been added to explain the various data sections.

“With the new DCMS v2.5, we are confident of going beyond simple data collation to providing analytical insights that can integrate with strategic business processes and directly contribute to our clients’ bottom line,” added Kelly Choo, Business Development Director of Brandtology.

For more information and a demo of the new DCMS v2.5, please contact:

About Brandtology

With more than 140 staff in 12 global locations, Brandtology’s business and brand online intelligence services enable global brands to manage and glean invaluable insights from consumers’ conversations. Using proprietary technology, processes and trained professionals, Brandtology is able to provide a high degree of accuracy and relevancy in multilingual analysis, unlike any other automated monitoring tools. Astute global organisations utilise Brandtology’s intelligence in multiple functional areas such as sales, marketing, PR, media planning, customer service and product development. For more information, please visit www.brandtology.com

Appendix A – Detailed explanation of Social Media Metrics

More details on http://www.brandtology.com/blog/dcms-v2-5/

a)    Engagement ( 0% – 100%)

The engagement metric quantifies the content creation and response level of a particular subject. The number of conversations unilaterally initiated, as well as the number of relevant comments and responses are taken into account in determining their relative engagement as compared to other subjects in the entire category. Thus, a brand that pushes out boring articles methodically without garnering responses will fare very poorly on the engagement front. Likewise for a brand that has low activity levels and relies on spill-over buzz from other articles which primary focus is not on them.

b)    Influence ( 0 – 100)

Conversations by key opinion leaders online or what we term as influencers are gauged on their influence level. Their influence score is derived based on various parameters such as the total number of posts made and replies to their posts. The median of all influencers discussing a particular subject is then presented as the influence of that subject.

The higher the influence score, the more powerful the conversations relating to a particular subject is in terms of generating comments and consequently readership levels.

c)    Reach ( 0% – 100%)

The voice of a brand may be concentrated within a few key sites or virally discussed across various influential channels online. When measuring reach, we look at how deep and wide the conversations relating to a particular subject ‘travel’ among influential channels online. A high reach score indicate the ability of a subject to spread related conversations far and wide.

d)    Sentiment Index for the Subject ( -100% – 100%)

Sentiment index looks at the average net sentiment score of all conversations within the subject. This index denotes whether the average sentiment of all buzz relating to a subject is more positive or more negative.

Brandtology releases Digital Conversation Management System v2.5

Monday, June 21st, 2010

How do I measure my Social Media influence/reach/engagement?

Ever so often, we hear this query raised by our clients and partners. As brands divert their focus to online marketing and consequently their budgets, there is a need to seek a more quantifiable manner of measuring the ROI of their activities on the social media platform. There are various metrics on our existing platform to aid in such analysis, but in response to feedback, we have decided to carve out an entire new section in our Digital Conversation Management System version 2.5.

The new system features six main new components:

1) Social Media Metrics:

  • Engagement
  • Reach
  • Influence
  • Sentiment
  • 2) Chart sampling feature – ability to toggle between rechecked conversations and the entire data set to generate quantitative and qualitative charts

    3) Account Statistical Profiling:

  • Buzz & Sentiments
  • Conversations & Voices
  • Channels
  • 4) Enhanced Social Media Equity Charts – allowing tracking of Social Media Equity (a 4d chart measuring buzz, sentiment, influence) over time and across subjects

    5) Conversation Trends – provision of buzz trends within a single conversation thread

    6) Bookmarking – enabling users to tag individual posts for easy follow-up and data export

    Menus have also been reorganised into intuitive sections to facilitate navigation and extraction of vital data required – namely Trends, Insights, Channels, Influencers and Social Media Equity. In addition, an FAQ section and tooltips have been added to explain the various data sections.

    Enhanced Metrics for ROI measurement and strategic business planning

    1.Social Media Metrics

    The various social media metrics newly introduced in our system enables brand managers to grasp an overview of all subjects being monitored (be it their brand, competing brands or their various product lines) in the social media space and discover market leaders and laggards.

    a) Engagement (0%-100%)

    The engagement metric quantifies the content creation and response level of a particular subject. The number of conversations unilaterally initiated, as well as the number of relevant comments and responses are taken into account in determining their relative engagement as compared to other subjects in the entire category. Thus, a brand that pushes out boring articles methodically without garnering responses will fare very poorly on the engagement front. Likewise for a brand that has low activity levels and relies on spill-over buzz from other articles which primary focus is not on them.

    b) Influence (0-100)

    Conversations by key opinion leaders online or what we term as influencers are gauged on their influence level. Their influence score is derived based on various parameters such as the total number of posts made and replies to their posts. The median of all influencers discussing a particular subject is then presented as the influence of that subject.

    The higher the influence score, the more powerful the conversations relating to a particular subject is in terms of generating comments and consequently readership levels.

    c) Reach (0%-100%)

    The voice of a brand may be concentrated within a few key sites or virally discussed across various influential channels online. When measuring reach, we look at how deep and wide the conversations relating to a particular subject ‘travel’ among influential channels online. A high reach score indicate the ability of a subject to spread related conversations far and wide.

    d) Sentiment Index for the Subject (-100%-100%)

    Sentiment index looks at the average net sentiment score of all conversations within the subject. This index denotes whether the average sentiment of all buzz relating to a subject is more positive or more negative.

    New Charting Features for Data Accuracy

    2) Chart sampling feature – ability to toggle between rechecked conversations and the entire data set to generate quantitative and qualitative charts

    By having trained social media analysts re-check the automated analysis performed by our technology, Brandtology ensures an exceptionally high accuracy and relevancy level of the data set provided to our clients. However, when doing an industry wide scan of conversations on competing products and other potential interest areas, clients typically only need an overview of the share of voice of their brands. Hence, the sampling feature allows the clients to see the share of voice clearly.

    Nevertheless, to differentiate between the automatically rated sentiments & buzz charts and buzz of rechecked conversations, especially for generating visual charts, we have added a feature to allow users to toggle between these 2 data sets.

    Statistical Profiling of Conversations for Deeper Insights

    3) Account Statistical Profiling

    The new account profile section gives a quick statistical overview snapshot of all subjects being monitored in terms of a) Buzz & Sentiments, b) Conversations and Voices and c) Channels.

    a) Buzz & Sentiments

    This table gives a summary of the total buzz for each subject, as well as the breakdown in sentiment for each subject. The numerical statistics are also colour coded, thus allowing you to quickly identify weaknesses or strengths of all subjects monitored in terms of buzz and sentiments.

    b) Conversations and Voices

    This Conversation and Voices table provides a summary of the new conversations, comments, as well as active voices engaging in a given subject.

    This is particularly useful for identifying popular conversations which are garnering a lot of comments/replies, as well as identifying the number of netizens contributing to the buzz. Interestingly, this would also enable clients to quickly detect ‘hot topics with numerous comments/replies but actually fuelled by a very small group of netizens. Such abnormalities would be easily picked up from this table.

    c) Channels

    The Channels table shows the total number of channels where conversations are taking place about each subject and further categorises them by channel type. This would help clients to identify dominant channel types for each subject and better plan their engagement/advertising efforts.

    Tracking of Social Media Equity over time for brand and campaign measurement

    4) Enhanced Social Media Equity Charts –allowing tracking of Social Media Equity (a 4d chart measuring buzz, sentiment, influence) over time and across subjects

    The Social Media Equity chart is a 4-dimensional chart that plots the position of a specific product or service in relation to other competing brands or other products/services within the same brand.

    This bubble chart is based on 4 factors – Average Sentiment, Average Influence, Buzz Share and Time. The x- and y-axes represent the average sentiment and influence respectively, with the size of the bubble indicating relative buzz share. The time factor can be adjusted to show the movement of individual bubbles along the chart over a specified time period.

    The Social Media Equity chart helps to gauge relative position not just amongst competitors but also amongst a brand’s stable of products and services. This is especially useful for product development departments to track the performance of various products.

    In this latest release of our DCMS, the Social Media Equity charts allow brands to track the performance of various subjects over time. In particular, this would be useful to track performance before a campaign, during a campaign and after a campaign to see if a campaign has resulted in a positive and sustained effect on a brand’s social media equity.

    Deeper Conversation Thread Analysis

    5) Conversation Trends – provision of buzz trends within a single conversation thread

    The ability to track the buzz trends of a particular conversation thread is also a new feature in the system. This allows brands to closely monitor hotly debated threads to see how the buzz unfolds. For positive seeded word-of-mouth, a long-tail effect is ideal but for negative brand conversations, it best to observe a decline in buzz after a few days.

    Bookmarking of Posts for Workflow Management and Efficient Follow-up

    6) Bookmarking – enabling users to tag individual posts for easy follow-up and data export

    For clients and partners who are more hands-on, a new bookmarking feature will allow them to bookmark selected posts for collation into a list for further analysis or export. This will facilitate research on specific conversation topics, or aid them in shortlisting posts which require further follow-up actions.

    Try out the new DCMS v.2.5

    If you are keen to see a demo session of our new DCMS, please do not hesitate to contact us via contact@brandtology.com

    Real-time consumer needs

    Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

    And then there was none.

    Looking at an online advertisement, you saw a product that you really want to get your hands on. Immediately, you rushed to the nearest mall, only to find out that there was none of the product that you really want.

    It happens all the time. For instance, when buying a mobile phone, you look on the Internet and you see all these choices of colors and features. Seeing all this, you decided on the specific handset brand, model, color, down to the memory capacity and data plans, only to be disappointed during purchase. Either the specifications you want cannot be met, or the handset is not in stock.

    You get the picture. At first, this seems like a trivial matter, but this situation actually affects brand perception. Availability is also the easiest way to lose potential customers to competitors. True enough, Patrick Kitano cites in his blog how real time consumer needs are not considered during advertising. Of particular interest is his argument on providing transaction solution for consumers.

    Before a brand or product could have a global impact, success at local levels must first be achieved. To this end, availability of products on a local scale should be given utmost importance, or a brand will die a slow, painful death. This is what transaction solution is about. It is not enough that online advertisements are creative and have great content. One must also ensure that the products being advertised can be easily found in local points of sale by a potential customer, or else the campaign is useless. Remember, if one can’t find it, one won’t buy it.

    In addition, companies can better plan their logistics by listening online to consumer preferences in terms of product model and purchase outlets. For instance, if a product is launched in 2 colours, black and white, and proactive collection of social media intelligence shows a higher buzz and positive preference towards the white model, the logistics department should plan to product and stock up more white models and cut back on the production of black models. This may have been impossible 10 years ago but today, with social media and sophisticated technology to measure and analyze online conversations, companies can react nimbly to such consumer demands. Failure to utilise the freely available pool of real-time consumer feedback online would be a pity.

    Conversely, knowing what consumers dislike about your competitors in real time and integrating such a feedback cycle in your product development, sales and ordering process will be immensely useful in gaining a competitive edge over them in term of shortening the lead time it takes to get a product out into the market. First-mover advantage is still a very important factor of success in today’s world where consumers are getting increasingly demanding and fickle.

    In a way, a good advertisement that does not translate to a good purchasing experience is similar to the boy who cried wolf. Not being able to deliver consumer needs will only produce feelings of disappointment towards a brand.  Unless real time consumer needs are met, advertisements will lose their effectiveness and fail to fulfill their original intended purpose.

    Social Media the No. 1 Emerging Channel for Lead Generation

    Friday, June 4th, 2010

    Sharing a great article from e-marketer on Social Media being the no. 1 emerging channel for lead generation for tech marketers. The article struck a chord with us as we are seeing more and more clients globally looking into the social media space not just to investigate what consumers are saying about them, but to turn such conversations into actionable leads. More and more, we see efforts to filter and integrate useful information within established CRM and management reporting systems. This trend is revving up in 2010 and it can only grow stronger as the volume of conversations online takes off globally with new social media platforms and exciting new mobile apps/devices.

    The article from e-Marketer.com is appended as follows:

    Social media is developing a reputation for being valuable not just for customer interaction and brand awareness but also for lead generation. In February 2010, for example, inbound online marketing platform HubSpot found Twitter usage could double monthly leads, and Onesource reported in January that business-to-business salespeople were looking to LinkedIn for prospecting.

    According to virtual events provider Unisfair, social media is the top emerging channel for lead gen among technology marketers surveyed in May 2010.

    Emerging Channels for Lead Generation in 2010* According to US Technology Marketers (% of respondents)

    Lead generation was marketers’ first priority, with 66% saying it was their greatest concern for 2010, compared with just 17% who chose brand awareness.

    When online marketing firm R2integrated surveyed US marketing professionals in April 2010 about why they had a social media strategy, the No.1 response was to increase lead generation.

    Main Reason for Implementing a Social Media Strategy According to US Marketing Professionals, April 2010 (% of respondents)

    Unqualified leads are a major problem, with one-third of Unisfair respondents saying they normally rejected 16% to 30% of their leads as unqualified.

    The most important types of information for determining whether a lead is valuable include interest and demographic information—which might make social media an even more useful prospecting channel, since profiles can include exactly the type of data salespeople are looking for. In addition, social media can provide a venue for nurturing leads that are not yet ready to buy.

    Brandtology is the official sponsor of “Advertising 2.0″ held on 3 June 2010, Hong Kong

    Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

    Brandtology is the official sponsor of “Advertising 2.0″ held in Hong Kong on 3rd June 2010. See you at our booth!

    Social Media: It’s not about the tools, it’s about the people.

    Monday, May 10th, 2010

    Information Overload; Tool Overload; Platform Overload; System Overload.

    The nature of social media is different from the media of old. Inherently, the sheer amount of information present out there dwarfs what a normal human being can possibly digest on a daily basis. While information has been increasing, human capacity to process this information has not grown significantly with it. Marketers, PR and other social media professionals grapple with the reality that they have to fight for attention on a daily basis just to register in peoples’ minds.

    Tools and applications were then designed to help to cope with the mountains of data in social media. There are countless applications being developed out there on the web. Which are the necessary ones? The ones that improve productivity? The ones that improve connectivity? There should be some stringent criteria to determine if an application is worth its salt. One cannot be switching to a new tool that does “everything but clean the kitchen sink”, each time developers release a new application/tool. Let’s not even go into how many different social media platforms there are out there, or even the aggregators that try to combine all the streams of information into one centralized place.

    Powerful features, but how many are used?

    Social media also has a largely DIY nature so far. It hardly makes sense to have a tool so complex that it cannot be easily adopted – social media evolves so quickly, that a platform/tool could very well have evolved if one does not catch up. People will vote with their feet and hop off to the next platform or tool that serves their needs better.

    Tools will always exist, and change quickly. One may be inundated with all the quirky features offered by a tool/platform, but only use a few main ones after a while (really). Most important is that what you’re using helps you achieve your aims.

    Sometimes, you may have to go where the crowd goes. Community platforms that currently form the social media landscape and have a gained significant traction include main players such as Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, Flickr, just to name a few. Newer ones to watch might include Foursquare and the recently released Google Buzz.
    At the end of the day, it is important to understand  the aim and purpose that one has:
    - Measuring social media ROI?
    - Establishing thought leadership in your field?
    - Collecting data on what people are saying about your organization/brand? For market research? For immediate PR responses?
    - Having a new channel to be able to communicate with your stakeholders, for promotions, WOM campaigns?
    - Doing it just because your competitors are? (what does this say about your strategy?)

    Regardless of which tools one chooses to use, as long as the aims are achieved, a campaign/initiative can be considered successful.
    It’s not about the tools. It’s about the people. People can make sense of the data and situation, technology is simply an enabler to better that process.
    This is not a new line of thought, but one that has been discussed even years ago. Ending off with this quote-worthy paragraph:

    “The thing is about the new technologies is not that they provide new, more efficient – better targeted or more relevant – messaging opportunities for businesses to exploit, but rather that it connects people to each other and that allows us to see each other (which you will hopefully remember allows us to emulate and thus drives the spread of behaviors and ideas).”

    The Importance of the Analyst

    Tuesday, April 6th, 2010
    I recently read on Nathan Gilliatt’s blog (great blog!) about the “The Importance of the Analyst” and felt compelled to leave a comment to add to the conversation and also to write this short post to share.
    An analyst (whether internally from the client, from the agency/consultant or from the service provider) has to have the right tools and skills to extract the relevant insights from the mountain of data.
    They would probably have to deal with the following:
    1. To determine relevancy of conversations (e.g. a “card” mentioned in the finance context might mean credit card but a “card” mentioned in an IT hardware context might mean “video or sound card”)
    2. To determine sarcastic posts, e.g. “Great 3G phone that has 30min battery life!”
    3. To configure, maintain and train the system. The usual saying of “rubbish in, rubbish out”. The analyst has to make sure that the keywords and other parameters are well configured to suit the intended goal of the listening process.

    Not an easy task in any measure (no pun intended). The complication piles up when the client has to deal with multiple languages, geographic locations, local nuances, etc.

    Whoever is looking for a truly global/regional solution has to consider these questions and to determine if there are these resources in place before committing into any “social media strategy” in the long run.

    Kelly Choo
    Co-founder & Product Development Director

     
    Tags
     
    Find out how Social Media Intelligence can help your Business and Brand
    Newer Entries »
    Contact us