Posts Tagged ‘Social Media Monitoring’
Friday, June 24th, 2011
Social media can do amazing things. It can open our eyes to the richness of human relationships and even break barriers of communication. At Brandtology, we believe that social media success is not all about numbers. It is about conversations, exchanges, dialogues and forming relationships.
Expanding on an exponential growth, social media is arguably conquering Asia by storm, not only in terms of reach but likewise in content created in various Asian languages.
As frontrunners in social media, Brandtology was not left unnoticed. BBC business reporter Saira Syed, quoted our very own Business Development Director Kelly Choo in her article “Social-web wave hits emerging Asia” citing how Brandtology can give companies insights into what netizens think of their products, image or marketing strategy.
Indeed, Brandtology is conquering Asia and beyond!
*For the full BBC article, “Social-web wave hits emerging Asia” check it here : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13773491
Tags: Social Media, Social media marketing, Social Media Monitoring Posted in Blog | No Comments »
Friday, August 13th, 2010
Asia Pacific Digital Brand Index (DBI) – Looking Back and Moving Forward
Looking back, Brandtology has reached a new milestone of having run the Asia Pacific Digital Brand Index with our partners at Edelman Digital APAC for a year now and I’m happy to say that it has been an astounding 4 releases of the DBI so far.
In summary we have so far covered:
- 8 million posts,
- representing the perspectives of millions of Netizens,
- talking about 350 technology brands,
- housed in 4,000 regional online channels,
- across 8 Asian markets.
The Top 10 most discussed technology brands in the 12 months (ending June 2010) across our eight Asian markets:
1. Google
2. Microsoft
3. Apple
4. Samsung
5. Intel
6. Nokia
7. Sony
8. Hewlett-Packard
9. Yahoo!
10. Research in Motion
Google consistently placed top in the past few studies even though we have removed keywords like “google it” to remove irrelevant mentions of the brand in the study. This shows that Google is indeed a brand name to be reckoned with and they should be exploiting it for other product extensions like Google Laptop, Google Tablet, Google Blender, etc (ok, I kid on the Blender part, but who knows what they will release next?).
Some of the macro-trends in the social media landscape across Asia are:
- Online chatter grows and the growth is startling: 800,000 posts in the first DBI and now up to 2,000,000. Can brands still afford not to be part of the conversation?
- The Twitter Phenomenon: Are we going from a web of pages to a web of streams and updates? However, in China, Sina microblog is gaining more prominence.
- Tech brands joining the conversation: Growth of creating local, regional and global fan pages in Facebook. More engagement opportunities rather than simply one way communication.
- Telcos and mobile chatter dominates: Local telcos are prominent in the Top 10 brands across all countries. On top of service, it is also driven by the hottest mobile phones they sell.
Moving forward, the DBI will continue to evolve and there will be more interesting angles to demonstrate how these top technology brands are leveraging on the growth of social media to build more content and engaging with the community.
Feel free to provide us your feedback/comments on the DBI!
The releases for the fourth Asia Pacific Digital Brand Index (10.3) for the various countries are as follows:
Information from the previous releases of DBI
Tags: Digital Brand Index, Digital Strategy, PR, Regional, social media intelligence, Social Media Monitoring Posted in Blog | 1 Comment »
Thursday, June 24th, 2010
Global Online Intelligence Leader, Brandtology releases Digital Conversation Management System v2.5 with enhanced measurement and tracking capabilities
24 JUNE 2010 – Brandtology, a global online intelligence service provider has rolled out the latest version of its Digital Conversation Management System (DCMS). The DCMS v2.5 comes with a comprehensive set of metrics to aid global brands and agencies in measuring key aspects of social media involvement, such as engagement, reach, influence and sentiments.
The various social media metrics newly introduced in the system will enable brand managers and consumer insight teams to grasp an overview of all subjects being monitored (be it their brand, competing brands or their various product lines) in the social media space and discover market leaders and laggards.
For instance, the ‘Engagement’ metric quantifies the content creation and response level of a particular subject. The number of conversations unilaterally initiated, as well as the number of relevant comments and responses are taken into account in determining their relative engagement as compared to other subjects in the entire category. Thus, a brand that pushes out boring articles methodically without garnering responses will fare very poorly on the engagement front.
Similarly, the ‘Influence’ metric measures whether conversations being made are by key opinion leaders online, thus translating to response generation and consequently readership. On the other hand, when measuring ‘Reach’, we look at how deep and wide the conversations relating to a particular subject ‘travel’ among influential channels online. A high reach score indicate the ability of a subject to spread related conversations far and wide. Last but not least, the ‘Sentiment’ index looks at the average net sentiment score of all conversations within the subject. More details on each metric can be found in Appendix A.
Commenting on the new DCMS v2.5, Eddie Chau, CEO of Brandtology said: “As brands divert their focus to social media marketing and consequently their budgets, there is a need to seek a more quantifiable manner of measuring the ROI of their activities on the social media platform. In response to feedback from our clients and partners, we have developed this new metric system for the purpose of such analysis.”
Besides the social media metrics section, the new system features five other new components such as an account profiling statistical overview, enhanced Social Media Equity charts to enable comparisons over time, conversation thread trend charts, a bookmarking feature to allow efficient workflow management and last but not least, a new chart sampling function unique to Brandtology.
By combining proprietary crawler technology to extract high volumes of relevant conversations from influential channels with trained social media analysts who recheck a portion of these conversations Brandtology is able to provide highly relevant and accurate insights. The new chart sampling feature leverages on this unique model to provide clients the option to toggle between the entire raw data set and rechecked conversations to show share of voice charts with near 100% accuracy.
“Due to the high volumes of conversations in countries with a large netizen base, such as USA and China, this chart sampling feature will allow clients the flexibility to manage and draw insights from large volumes of data but still be able to produce highly accurate charts for key categories for management reporting,” Eden Lau, Managing Director of North Asia, Brandtology, opined.
Apart from new feature, menus in the new DCMS v2.5 have also been reorganised into more intuitive sections to facilitate navigation and extraction of vital data required – namely Trends, Insights, Channels, Influencers and Social Media Equity. In addition, an FAQ section and tooltips have been added to explain the various data sections.
“With the new DCMS v2.5, we are confident of going beyond simple data collation to providing analytical insights that can integrate with strategic business processes and directly contribute to our clients’ bottom line,” added Kelly Choo, Business Development Director of Brandtology.
For more information and a demo of the new DCMS v2.5, please contact:

About Brandtology
With more than 140 staff in 12 global locations, Brandtology’s business and brand online intelligence services enable global brands to manage and glean invaluable insights from consumers’ conversations. Using proprietary technology, processes and trained professionals, Brandtology is able to provide a high degree of accuracy and relevancy in multilingual analysis, unlike any other automated monitoring tools. Astute global organisations utilise Brandtology’s intelligence in multiple functional areas such as sales, marketing, PR, media planning, customer service and product development. For more information, please visit www.brandtology.com
Appendix A – Detailed explanation of Social Media Metrics
More details on http://www.brandtology.com/blog/dcms-v2-5/

a) Engagement ( 0% – 100%)
The engagement metric quantifies the content creation and response level of a particular subject. The number of conversations unilaterally initiated, as well as the number of relevant comments and responses are taken into account in determining their relative engagement as compared to other subjects in the entire category. Thus, a brand that pushes out boring articles methodically without garnering responses will fare very poorly on the engagement front. Likewise for a brand that has low activity levels and relies on spill-over buzz from other articles which primary focus is not on them.
b) Influence ( 0 – 100)
Conversations by key opinion leaders online or what we term as influencers are gauged on their influence level. Their influence score is derived based on various parameters such as the total number of posts made and replies to their posts. The median of all influencers discussing a particular subject is then presented as the influence of that subject.
The higher the influence score, the more powerful the conversations relating to a particular subject is in terms of generating comments and consequently readership levels.
c) Reach ( 0% – 100%)
The voice of a brand may be concentrated within a few key sites or virally discussed across various influential channels online. When measuring reach, we look at how deep and wide the conversations relating to a particular subject ‘travel’ among influential channels online. A high reach score indicate the ability of a subject to spread related conversations far and wide.
d) Sentiment Index for the Subject ( -100% – 100%)
Sentiment index looks at the average net sentiment score of all conversations within the subject. This index denotes whether the average sentiment of all buzz relating to a subject is more positive or more negative.
Tags: Branding, Buzz, Channels, Competitor Intelligence, Corporate, DCMS, Digital Strategy, Event, Influencer, Insights, Marketing, PR, Regional, Reports, social media intelligence, Social Media Monitoring Posted in Newsroom | No Comments »
Monday, June 21st, 2010
How do I measure my Social Media influence/reach/engagement?
Ever so often, we hear this query raised by our clients and partners. As brands divert their focus to online marketing and consequently their budgets, there is a need to seek a more quantifiable manner of measuring the ROI of their activities on the social media platform. There are various metrics on our existing platform to aid in such analysis, but in response to feedback, we have decided to carve out an entire new section in our Digital Conversation Management System version 2.5.
The new system features six main new components:
1) Social Media Metrics:
Engagement
Reach
Influence
Sentiment
2) Chart sampling feature – ability to toggle between rechecked conversations and the entire data set to generate quantitative and qualitative charts
3) Account Statistical Profiling:
Buzz & Sentiments
Conversations & Voices
Channels
4) Enhanced Social Media Equity Charts – allowing tracking of Social Media Equity (a 4d chart measuring buzz, sentiment, influence) over time and across subjects
5) Conversation Trends – provision of buzz trends within a single conversation thread
6) Bookmarking – enabling users to tag individual posts for easy follow-up and data export
Menus have also been reorganised into intuitive sections to facilitate navigation and extraction of vital data required – namely Trends, Insights, Channels, Influencers and Social Media Equity. In addition, an FAQ section and tooltips have been added to explain the various data sections.
Enhanced Metrics for ROI measurement and strategic business planning
1.Social Media Metrics
The various social media metrics newly introduced in our system enables brand managers to grasp an overview of all subjects being monitored (be it their brand, competing brands or their various product lines) in the social media space and discover market leaders and laggards.

a) Engagement (0%-100%)
The engagement metric quantifies the content creation and response level of a particular subject. The number of conversations unilaterally initiated, as well as the number of relevant comments and responses are taken into account in determining their relative engagement as compared to other subjects in the entire category. Thus, a brand that pushes out boring articles methodically without garnering responses will fare very poorly on the engagement front. Likewise for a brand that has low activity levels and relies on spill-over buzz from other articles which primary focus is not on them.
b) Influence (0-100)
Conversations by key opinion leaders online or what we term as influencers are gauged on their influence level. Their influence score is derived based on various parameters such as the total number of posts made and replies to their posts. The median of all influencers discussing a particular subject is then presented as the influence of that subject.
The higher the influence score, the more powerful the conversations relating to a particular subject is in terms of generating comments and consequently readership levels.
c) Reach (0%-100%)
The voice of a brand may be concentrated within a few key sites or virally discussed across various influential channels online. When measuring reach, we look at how deep and wide the conversations relating to a particular subject ‘travel’ among influential channels online. A high reach score indicate the ability of a subject to spread related conversations far and wide.
d) Sentiment Index for the Subject (-100%-100%)
Sentiment index looks at the average net sentiment score of all conversations within the subject. This index denotes whether the average sentiment of all buzz relating to a subject is more positive or more negative.
New Charting Features for Data Accuracy
2) Chart sampling feature – ability to toggle between rechecked conversations and the entire data set to generate quantitative and qualitative charts

By having trained social media analysts re-check the automated analysis performed by our technology, Brandtology ensures an exceptionally high accuracy and relevancy level of the data set provided to our clients. However, when doing an industry wide scan of conversations on competing products and other potential interest areas, clients typically only need an overview of the share of voice of their brands. Hence, the sampling feature allows the clients to see the share of voice clearly.
Nevertheless, to differentiate between the automatically rated sentiments & buzz charts and buzz of rechecked conversations, especially for generating visual charts, we have added a feature to allow users to toggle between these 2 data sets.
Statistical Profiling of Conversations for Deeper Insights
3) Account Statistical Profiling
The new account profile section gives a quick statistical overview snapshot of all subjects being monitored in terms of a) Buzz & Sentiments, b) Conversations and Voices and c) Channels.
a) Buzz & Sentiments
This table gives a summary of the total buzz for each subject, as well as the breakdown in sentiment for each subject. The numerical statistics are also colour coded, thus allowing you to quickly identify weaknesses or strengths of all subjects monitored in terms of buzz and sentiments.

b) Conversations and Voices
This Conversation and Voices table provides a summary of the new conversations, comments, as well as active voices engaging in a given subject.
This is particularly useful for identifying popular conversations which are garnering a lot of comments/replies, as well as identifying the number of netizens contributing to the buzz. Interestingly, this would also enable clients to quickly detect ‘hot topics with numerous comments/replies but actually fuelled by a very small group of netizens. Such abnormalities would be easily picked up from this table.

c) Channels
The Channels table shows the total number of channels where conversations are taking place about each subject and further categorises them by channel type. This would help clients to identify dominant channel types for each subject and better plan their engagement/advertising efforts.

Tracking of Social Media Equity over time for brand and campaign measurement
4) Enhanced Social Media Equity Charts –allowing tracking of Social Media Equity (a 4d chart measuring buzz, sentiment, influence) over time and across subjects


The Social Media Equity chart is a 4-dimensional chart that plots the position of a specific product or service in relation to other competing brands or other products/services within the same brand.
This bubble chart is based on 4 factors – Average Sentiment, Average Influence, Buzz Share and Time. The x- and y-axes represent the average sentiment and influence respectively, with the size of the bubble indicating relative buzz share. The time factor can be adjusted to show the movement of individual bubbles along the chart over a specified time period.
The Social Media Equity chart helps to gauge relative position not just amongst competitors but also amongst a brand’s stable of products and services. This is especially useful for product development departments to track the performance of various products.
In this latest release of our DCMS, the Social Media Equity charts allow brands to track the performance of various subjects over time. In particular, this would be useful to track performance before a campaign, during a campaign and after a campaign to see if a campaign has resulted in a positive and sustained effect on a brand’s social media equity.
Deeper Conversation Thread Analysis
5) Conversation Trends – provision of buzz trends within a single conversation thread


The ability to track the buzz trends of a particular conversation thread is also a new feature in the system. This allows brands to closely monitor hotly debated threads to see how the buzz unfolds. For positive seeded word-of-mouth, a long-tail effect is ideal but for negative brand conversations, it best to observe a decline in buzz after a few days.
Bookmarking of Posts for Workflow Management and Efficient Follow-up
6) Bookmarking – enabling users to tag individual posts for easy follow-up and data export

For clients and partners who are more hands-on, a new bookmarking feature will allow them to bookmark selected posts for collation into a list for further analysis or export. This will facilitate research on specific conversation topics, or aid them in shortlisting posts which require further follow-up actions.
Try out the new DCMS v.2.5
If you are keen to see a demo session of our new DCMS, please do not hesitate to contact us via contact@brandtology.com
Tags: Channels, DCMS, Influencer, Insights, Sentiments, social media intelligence, Social Media Monitoring Posted in Blog | No Comments »
Monday, May 10th, 2010
Information Overload; Tool Overload; Platform Overload; System Overload.
The nature of social media is different from the media of old. Inherently, the sheer amount of information present out there dwarfs what a normal human being can possibly digest on a daily basis. While information has been increasing, human capacity to process this information has not grown significantly with it. Marketers, PR and other social media professionals grapple with the reality that they have to fight for attention on a daily basis just to register in peoples’ minds.
Tools and applications were then designed to help to cope with the mountains of data in social media. There are countless applications being developed out there on the web. Which are the necessary ones? The ones that improve productivity? The ones that improve connectivity? There should be some stringent criteria to determine if an application is worth its salt. One cannot be switching to a new tool that does “everything but clean the kitchen sink”, each time developers release a new application/tool. Let’s not even go into how many different social media platforms there are out there, or even the aggregators that try to combine all the streams of information into one centralized place.
Powerful features, but how many are used?
Social media also has a largely DIY nature so far. It hardly makes sense to have a tool so complex that it cannot be easily adopted – social media evolves so quickly, that a platform/tool could very well have evolved if one does not catch up. People will vote with their feet and hop off to the next platform or tool that serves their needs better.
Tools will always exist, and change quickly. One may be inundated with all the quirky features offered by a tool/platform, but only use a few main ones after a while (really). Most important is that what you’re using helps you achieve your aims.
Sometimes, you may have to go where the crowd goes. Community platforms that currently form the social media landscape and have a gained significant traction include main players such as Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, Flickr, just to name a few. Newer ones to watch might include Foursquare and the recently released Google Buzz.
At the end of the day, it is important to understand the aim and purpose that one has:
- Measuring social media ROI?
- Establishing thought leadership in your field?
- Collecting data on what people are saying about your organization/brand? For market research? For immediate PR responses?
- Having a new channel to be able to communicate with your stakeholders, for promotions, WOM campaigns?
- Doing it just because your competitors are? (what does this say about your strategy?)
Regardless of which tools one chooses to use, as long as the aims are achieved, a campaign/initiative can be considered successful.
It’s not about the tools. It’s about the people. People can make sense of the data and situation, technology is simply an enabler to better that process.
This is not a new line of thought, but one that has been discussed even years ago. Ending off with this quote-worthy paragraph:
“The thing is about the new technologies is not that they provide new, more efficient – better targeted or more relevant – messaging opportunities for businesses to exploit, but rather that it connects people to each other and that allows us to see each other (which you will hopefully remember allows us to emulate and thus drives the spread of behaviors and ideas).”
Tags: Digital Strategy, Insights, Social Media, social media intelligence, Social Media Monitoring Posted in Blog | No Comments »
Wednesday, March 24th, 2010
Brandtology CEO, Eddie Chau will be speaking at ARF Re:Think 2010 Conference in New York on 24 March in Key Issue Forum Session #1. Details are as follows:
Key Issue Forum Session #1
BUILDING AND MANAGING BRANDS GLOBALLY
Wilder Room, 4th Floor
MODERATOR: Eddie Chau – Founder & CEO, Brandtology
Local is the New Global
Discover some of the challenges faced by brand owners to build a global brand, including language, culture and geo-political considerations in the new media era where the consumer is king.
Eddie Chau – Founder & CEO, Brandtology
From Local to Global Branding: A Coca-Cola Case Study
Learn how a sports beverage brand defined a unifying global position.
Anne McAllester – Director – Knowledge and Insights, The Coca-Cola Company
Eric Hogue – Vice President, Millward Brown
Neil Mathis – Account Group Director, Millward Brown
Redefining Retail Promotion Allocation
Learn how to properly allocate media resources against behaviorally identified customer groups with known media preferences.
Martin Block – Professor, Northwestern University
Tags: Advertising, Branding, Competitor Intelligence, Marketing, PR, Social Media, Social Media Monitoring Posted in Blog | No Comments »
Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010
After our team spoke with Marshall Sponder last week to explain our services to him, he has very kindly published a review of our Digital Conversation Management System. His review clearly articulates our key differentiation from self serve platforms – the highly structured customisation and data verification process for each client.
“Brandtology is among the “high end”platforms …… for large companies – who require precision and structure not obtainable with self serve platforms …”
“Nothing against the self serve platforms – it’s more that once you get past the exploratory stage, a company might need to have data that is organized in a very specific way. For example, many large corporations use custom metatags to drive automation and high end features of their sites. I know IBM.com does this because I worked on aspects of it when I was part of IBM’s Web Effectiveness team a few years back. I noticed in Brandtology, aspects of their reporting that could support and work within that customization.”
” Also, Line of Business reputation monitoring by country and language is not that easy to do in self serve platform,it seems to me that when you need reporting on that level, you’re going to have a platform like Brandtology.”
“You, the client, can drill down very atomically into the data with confidence a few people have already touched the data and make sure it’s relevant to your company and brand obviously, Brandtology works closely with your Brand (hence the name) so they know what you want”
Thanks for the great review, Marshall. We especially liked your concluding line- “Brandtology has what it takes to get the job done“.
Tags: Buzz, Corporate, DCMS, Insights, Sentiments, Social Media, Social Media Monitoring Posted in Blog | No Comments »
|
|
| |
|
Find out how Social Media Intelligence can help your Business and Brand
|
 |
| « Older Entries |
|
|